

yea and I don’t like how its written
yea and I don’t like how its written
when I first heard about MS recall
no😢
ai has a place in the world, but replacing something like this is not where it should be used
this guys gonna get the fucking Darwin award if he keeps doing this 🤦
you clearly didn’t read the part of what I wrote where I mentioned medicine
this would kill people 🤦
or do you want the internet to disappear because no chips are being made? you don’t want Lemmy to exist? wow
and at the same time you would want to cost everyone their jobs?
if ur gonna use ai like this make sure you understand very well the code its giving you
yeah. actually I do care about the ecosystem but I don’t think messing up everything is the best way of fixing stuff. I’d much rather electric trains carry the bulk of transportation than simply stopping all transportation
if you want to ‘save the world’ while stopping
then go and try, but don’t be surprised when no one is in favor of your insane plan
well maybe you should care
do you realize that if shiping became vastly more expensive then fertilizers will become more expensive and then so will food?? not to mention how much more expensive meds would get
the whole world relies on this, and its not just about consumerism
also no avocados if no shiping
You know how many ships are needed to transport the thousands of components in the vast supply chain of computer chips? its a lot
If shiping slows down, computer chips become more expensive. And the whole world relies on them for everything. That includes you.
i really doubt sail powered ships are as fast as oil powered ones
planes need oil, as do ships.
I agree with some of what you’ve said but not all
Bitcoin has intrinsic value because its simply more practical for society to collectively hallucinate that it’s valuable, because it allows for more trade. And at the same time, its deflationary, causing that collectively hallucinated value to increase over time. The only case in which Bitcoin could ever fall to zero would be in a 51% attack if the attacker chose to double spend a ton of coins, hyperinflation the currency - but that would never happen, because it would be super expensive, and because its not in the attackers economic interest, so it makes sense to rule out that scenario. This is arguably less likely than nuclear war.
well not all of Lemmy is anticrypto, there’s a few communites and instances here that talk about that sorta thing
I’m sorta pissed at Satoshi for making Bitcoin so deflationary because it incentives people to hold onto their Bitcoin for as long as possible without using it as a currency. Anyway if you’re fine with holding this for a few decades it’ll almost currently go up, and if you wait a few centuries it would probably eclipse the value of any other assets you own.
I agree with some of what you’ve said but not all
Bitcoin has intrinsic value because its simply more practical for society to collectively hallucinate that it’s valuable, because it allows for more trade. And at the same time, its deflationary, causing that collectively hallucinated value to increase over time. The only case in which Bitcoin could ever fall to zero would be in a 51% attack if the attacker chose to double spend a ton of coins, hyperinflation the currency - but that would never happen, because it would be super expensive, and because its not in the attackers economic interest, so it makes sense to rule out that scenario. This is arguably less likely than nuclear war.
I agree with some of what you’ve said but not all
bitcoin has intrinsic value because its simply more practice for society to collectively hallucinate that its valuable, because it allows for more trade. and at the same time, its deflationary, causing that collectively hallucinated value to increase over time. The only case in which Bitcoin could ever fall to zero would be in a 51% attack if the attacker chose to double spend a ton of coins, hyperinflation the currency - but that would never happen, because it would be super expensive, and because its not in the attackers economic interest, so it makes sense to rule out that scenario. its arguably less likely then nuclear war
Id like it if they created it and let saner people moderate it
but noooo, they need to tell the world about how China isnt doing genocides, and how Ukraine is filled with nazis
I blame the .ml mods and all the ultra far left commies they invited here
Not publicizing a fool proof nuclear counter-measure defeats the purpose of achieving it in the first place.
yeah but if they don’t tell anyone they can keep it secret and other countries wouldn’t try to make their own
What I understood you to be saying is that the world should ASAP make this change and I was telling you the effects of doing it too fast. Also nuclear powered ships have their own problems, like putting nuclear fuel in countries that might have more terrorism. I wouldn’t want Iran to have a nuclear powered ship much more than I would want them to have a nuclear bomb (which I really don’t want them to have)
Extremely minor detail with how I ordered a list. At any rate I think that because most people aren’t sick and all people need money to buy food, money might actually matter slightly more. But that really isn’t relevant at all.
I use grammer when it benifits me. You can still read what I’m writing if I make a few spelling mistakes. this too is kinda irelavent
shity world. Ngl Id like it if there was some push to greenify transportation too, but I just don’t think the way you described is the best