Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised if it was a PR spin.
I imagine the conversation going something like this:
"Holy shit, the Ukrainians almost hit the presidential helicopter. This makes us look real bad.
Okay, here’s what we do. We tell everybody that it was us, and it was totally on purpose so they don’t realize how close the Ukrainians came to winning the war"
Even if it does, eligible parties are free to opt out of the class action and file their own individual suits.
No no no… They’d have to be in the Internet first, and so far, the web is only Americans, Russian bots, and South Korean gamers.
No Europeans here …
Don’t get me wrong, I think he should be strung up.
But I’m curious what gives Finland the authority to charge a Russian for crimes committed in Ukraine?
That does certainly seem to lend credence to the position of "Europe was happy to let the US foot the bill’
Seems like putting all your eggs in two baskets isn’t a whole lot better…
Because the Democratic party is, and always has been, a willing collaborator.
They have their petty squabbles, but they’ve always been on the same side in regards to making sure the wealthy and powerful stay that way, at all costs.
Nuclear weapons didn’t prevent Ukraine
They sure at shit would have.
Putin only invaded because Ukraine voluntarily disarmed after promises of protection from the US.
Hmmm… Are you a pretty, blonde white woman?
he aint voting trump ever, and same thing with a loyal maga supporter, they aint ever switching to vote Democrat.)
That’s not strictly true, and varies by state.
Most states have faithless elector laws that may invalidate and/or penalize the elector if they attempt to cast their electoral votes contrary to the electorate votes within the state.
You got the 2025 edition early?!
Where is yours? The second amendment is for everyone.
Criminals and dictators both love defenseless victims.
That poor duck…
Does it? All the connectors I’m thinking of on the motherboard have protruding pins, which seem a lot more phallic to me. Are they really considered the ‘female’ connectors?
Sure, but “retaliatory strikes” would probably be a more accurate descriptor. “Attack” often carries the implication of a first strike