And just like that we’re at silly made up hypothetical situations to drive fear and an agenda. That’s not even worth entertaining.

It’s all hypothetical until it isn’t anymore. You’re literally the slowly boiled frog.

I would appreciate not being lied to. Call it “I can’t beelieve it’s not Honey”, write the proper list of ingredients on the back and I’m fine with it.

No. Common sense has been replaced by the constant normalization of tracking and personalized ads.

Assuming the attacker knows it’s a phrase: The english language alone apparently has some 800.000 words. 800.000^6 = 2*10^35 combinations in a dictionary attack. That’s comparable to 18 random ASCII characters. We might also be using a different language, or a combination of languages, or we might deliberately misspell words.

A long string of random characters will give you more combinations per password length, but there are some passwords you just need to be able to memorize, and I’d say that’s more likely with the 6 words.

They don’t know how bookmarks work.

A lot less damage I’d say. Also, the job is for life, and even if he resigned they’d lock him away in some villa and he wouldn’t be allowed to make public statements anymore.

Win win win if you ask me.

You can work on them in libre office.

I used the internet without an ad blocker.

Because Microsoft bribed them by moving their German HQ there.

The “loosing hair where I want it to grow and growing it where I definitely don’t want it to grow” thing.

Fucking legend!

As far as I remember, the US interpreted “their end of the deal” differently than NK did.

That’s exactly my point: Trump will “negotiate” the same way, will brag about a “deal” in the same way, and nothing will change in the same way, because both sides aren’t really interested in substantial change in the same way.

But Trump made a deal. The best deal in the history of deals.

I’m sure they will denuclearize in the same way North Korea did after Trump negotiated.

It annoys me to no end whenever MS word does that.

That doesn’t absolve them.

With the feature removed, websites can act like they didn’t even go against my wishes.

and I distinctly said that it should be “a right”

Yes, you did, but you said it as part of an answer to the question “why are landlords considered parasites?”, and you explained that those who own more homes than they can live in are parasites. The logical conclusion (would be that it should be outlawed to be a landlord.

So, how am I to understand that? Should there be a quota, an acceptable amount of parasites so to speak?

People own apartments too. If you can’t own more than one home, surely apartments would also be covered by that?

If that means the government* subsidises it for the low income families (as in owns them and rents them at below market value), so be it.

Not everybody who doesn’t want to buy is low income. I’m too lazy / risk averse to maintain everything myself, so I happily pay my landlord a reasonable premium to bear the risk of shit burning down (or breaking in less dramatic ways) for me. I also like that I would be able to pack up and move without worrying about selling my old place. I might change my mind later on, but right now I’m good.

Why should governments subsidize the lifestyle choice I’m consciously making?

You assume that everybody wants to own and that just isn’t the case.